New WHO guidance on non-clinical interventions specifically designed to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections
				
							
								
					
				
							
								
					
				
					
						
		| 11 Octobre 2018
First of its kind – new WHO guideline aims to help reduce worldwide increase in caesarean section rates
A caesarean section is a surgical procedure that, when undertaken for  medical reasons, can save the life of a woman and her baby. Many  caesarean sections are undertaken unnecessarily however, which can put  the lives and well-being of women and their babies at risk – both in the  short and the long-term.
 
 Worldwide, caesarean section rates have been steadily increasing,  without significant benefit to the health of women or their babies. In  recognition of the urgent need to address the sustained and  unprecedented rise in these rates, WHO has today published new guidance  on non-clinical interventions specifically designed to reduce  unnecessary caesarean sections.
 
 First of its kind
 
 The new guideline, WHO recommendations on non-clinical interventions to  reduce unnecessary caesarean sections, incorporates the views, fears and  beliefs of both women and health professionals about caesarean  sections. It also considers the complex dynamics and limitations of  health systems and organizations and relationships between women, health  professionals and organization of health care services. The key  recommendations include: 
- Educational interventions for women and families to support meaningful dialogue with providers and informed decision-making on mode of delivery (i.e. providing childbirth training workshops for mothers and couples, relaxation training programmes led by nurses, psychosocial couple-based prevention programmes, psychoeducation for women with fear of pain or anxiety).
 - Use of clinical guidelines, audits of caesarean sections, and timely feedback to health professionals about caesarean section practices.
 - Requirement for second opinion for caesarean section indication at point of care in settings with adequate resources.
 - Some interventions aimed at health organizations are recommended only under rigorous research such as collaborative midwifery-obstetrician model of care (i.e. a model of staffing based on care provided primarily by midwives, with 24-hour back-up from an obstetrician who provides in-house labour and delivery coverage without other competing clinical duties) or financial strategies (i.e. insurance reforms equalizing physician fees for vaginal births and caesarean sections).
 
Inequality and risks
 
 While many women in need of caesarean sections still do not have access  to caesarean section particularly in low resource settings, many others  undergo the procedure unnecessarily, for reasons which cannot be  medically justified.
 
 Caesarean birth is associated with short- and long-term risks that can  extend many years beyond the current delivery and affect the health of  the woman, the child and future pregnancies. These risks are higher in  women with limited access to comprehensive obstetric care. Caesarean  sections are also costly, and high rates of unnecessary caesarean  sections can therefore pull resources away from other essential health  services, particularly in overloaded and weak health systems.
 
 Dr Betran comments, “It is crucial that women who need caesarean  sections are able to access this potentially life-saving procedure, but  equally unnecessary procedures should be avoided, so that the lives and  well-being of women and their babies are not put at risk.”
 
 Understanding context
 
 There are many complex reasons for the increase of caesarean section  rates, and these vary widely between and within countries. Before  implementing any intervention to reduce rates, research should be done  which identifies and defines why rates are increasing in the particular  setting, as well as what the locally relevant determinants of caesarean  births are, as well as women and providers’ views and cultural norms.
 
 In addition, interventions to reduce rates that do not address the  complex, multi-faceted reasons for the increase of rates, will be likely  to have limited impact. Interventions that have multiple components are  likely to be more successful and are therefore more desirable.
http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/guidance-to-reduce-unnecessary-caesarean-sections/en/






